The Australian experience of COVID demonstrates the benefits of 90 per cent of eligible people being vaccinated.
As a nation we've been at our best when we've pulled together.
But when political and sectional interests have taken the crisis hostage, the pandemic has also shown us at our worst, raising questions about our national resilience.
It was a panic about toilet paper that first pointed to an underlying fragility in our community cohesion - later compounded by divisive and isolating state border blockades.
Overnight we were made 'dual-citizens', not of a nation, but of a federation of competing sometimes hostile states.
Then there were the lockdowns that, while saving lives, also masked substantial vulnerabilities in essential public services.
Delays and shortages in imports of medical supplies and other advanced manufactures graphically shot home the limited self-sufficiency of our island economy.
Noisy fringe opposition to immunisation and social-distancing flouted at science and expertise but populist politicians elevated it into broader grass-roots disaffection with the major parties.
And through it all an understandable anxiety and fear of life being turned on its head showed quietly in the mental health of so many.
Two years later with supply chains in disarray, the workforce decimated by Omicron, and shortages everywhere, it seems our governments are not learning quickly enough how to be more agile, adaptive, and anticipating of consequential impacts.
That is concerning because as the World Economic Forum just reported, infectious disease stands alongside cybersecurity, climate change, geopolitical conflict, artificial intelligence, and space competition as likely sources of further near term disruption.
So short of constitutional reform what more should we be doing? Let's start by not trying to solve complex problems in isolation but look for triple bottom line outcomes.
Trust in our public institutions is essential for national resilience.
For trust to be restored we need less partisanship and paternalism and greater transparency from governments about what can and cannot be done.
The National Cabinet is a good start, but it will fail if politics alone shapes its vision and work.
Closer to the ground much greater emphasis has to be given to policies that encourage collaboration and private sector investment and capacity building in vital enabling infrastructure and technology.
And lastly, as communities we should also focus more on what we ourselves can do for ourselves without first looking to government.
These are the essential values of resilience and they need stronger expression in our politics, economy, and community.
- John Cole, Institute for Resilient Regions, University of Southern Queensland
IN OTHER NEWS:
Want daily news highlights delivered to your inbox? Sign up to the Queensland Country Life newsletter below.